A few software tools can help writers of online magazines to test for the originality of reports, and in this capacity tools such as Copyscape are excellent. They allow an publisher to ascertain if the article use has been copied or never and if so to what extent. The tools are wonderful for this purpose.
Paraphrasing tools are also excellent if you are a creative writer stuck for a synonym, but are not so good if you want to change a substantial body of text together with want a tool to paraphrase it. The end results are usually non-sensical to readers. Writers whom do this kind of thing may have an original text, but no one wants to read it.
Meant for academic writing, especially dissertations and PhD theses, you’ll need a human proofreader-editor to check job rather than a software tool. If you have someone whose written English is better than yours, then ask them to go through your work and make the info changes to grammar together with spelling. You have to have consistent punctuational, either US or English English except for quotations as you cannot change the spelling in these.
If you think your pals are not proficient enough so that you can tackle your writing, then you definitely should consider using the services of professional academic proofreaders and editors. Proofreaders check for errors, and may not comment on this of your work. They may not comment on the amount of padding its content has. That being so you may wish to hire the services of an proofreader-editor who will comment on superfluous pieces of text and give tips as to how your work is usually improved.
It happens to be fine to use formatting equipment and spell checks, although if you are writing academic English, it is likely that a grammar looking at tool will not know how to tackle such writing, as it is not really natural language or at least not the natural speech the software tool has been set to accept as correct.
You can ask that editor to simply change what is necessary or ask for comments only. A good editor will be knowledgeable about the domain you are writing in and often will also be able to check for plagiarism as sometimes it is obvious to your trained eye, as the written language changes when you use somebody else’s words. A software tool may well not be able to pick up on these changes to your written fashion.
Of course it is best not to plagiarize, but sometimes this is executed inadvertently, as there is nothing more standard than paraphrasing. Citing some sort of author and giving credit standing for his/her work must be done as a matter surely. A good proofreader editor is way better than a software tool for tidying up and preparing ones own written work before it can be submitted.